Judge Says Paxil Claims Conflict with Federal Law, Dismisses Case
March 6, 2008
DOCUMENTS
- Motion
- Orders
TULSA, Okla. - A Paxil case has been dismissed on the merits after a federal judge found, among other things, that the plaintiff's claims were barred by conflict preemption. Miller v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., et al., No. 03-393 (N.D. Okla.).
Judge Gregory K. Frizzell of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma awarded summary judgment Feb. 15 to Paxil manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline, which had previously argued that the plaintiffs' failure-to-warn and fraud-on-the-FDA allegations were preempted by federal law.
Judge Frizzell reached the decision after rejecting the defendant's contention that the plaintiff's claims failed to created a genuine issue …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone
June 27, 2024 - Buffalo, NY
The Richardson Hotel Buffalo
HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: Video Game Addiction and the Latest Mass Tort Updates
May 29, 2024 - Salt Lake City, UT
The Grand America Hotel