6th Cir. Dashes Breakfast Chain’s Hopes for COVID-19 Coverage



DOCUMENTS
  • Opinion


LOUISVILLE, Ky. — A federal appellate court has upheld dismissal of a COVID-19 coverage action filed by a midwestern breakfast chain, affirming that it failed to allege its losses were caused by the actual or alleged exposure to COVID-19, as required by the policy’s Restaurant Extension Endorsement.

On Sept. 9, a 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel majority agreed with a Kentucky federal judge that Wild Eggs Holdings Inc.’s allegations did not trigger coverage because the government closure orders were issued in response to the pandemic, rather than the actual or alleged presence of the virus at its restaurants.






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone

June 25, 2025 - Buffalo, NY
The Westin Buffalo

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's Justice for All Conference: Complex Litigation in Philadelphia's Evolving Legal Landscape

April 15, 2025 - Philadelphia, PA
The Logan Philadelphia

MORE DETAILS