Lloyd’s Underwriters Say $3.7 Million Reinsurance Dispute Not Arbitrable
January 16, 2019
DOCUMENTS
- Opposition
BALTIMORE — Certain Lloyd’s of London Underwriters say they should not be required to arbitrate a $3.7 million reinsurance dispute because the reinsurance contract and its arbitration clause are void ab initio due to misrepresentations made by the cedents during the contract’s formation.
In a Jan. 11 brief filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, Underwriters contend that due to the cedents’ fraudulent actions, there is no contract pursuant to which either party can seek enforcement, including seeking the right to demand arbitration.
On Sept. 25, 2017, a fire occurred at Whitehouse & Shapiro LLC’s Baltimore …
FIRM NAMES
- Butler Rubin Saltarelli & Boyd
- Niles Barton & Wilmer
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach