Provision Unclear as to Whether Arbitration is Mandatory, Judge Rules



DOCUMENTS
  • Order


DENVER - A Colorado federal judge has refused to compel arbitration of a $40 million insurance dispute, ruling that the movant has failed to prove at this stage of the litigation that the policy's arbitration provision is mandatory, rather than optional. Lowry Assumption LLC v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance Co., No. 10-2901 (D. Colo.).

On April 5, Senior Judge Walker D. Miller of the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado determined that the provision is ambiguous and that the movant "must carry its burden to establish that arbitration is mandatory through a factual determination on the issue."






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: Video Game Addiction and the Latest Mass Tort Updates

May 29, 2024 - Salt Lake City, UT
The Grand America Hotel

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone

June 27, 2024 - Buffalo, NY
The Richardson Hotel Buffalo

MORE DETAILS