Parties in Ala. Limitations Dispute Continue to File Briefs in High Court



DOCUMENTS
  • Amicus Brief
  • Response
  • Response


MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- Parties involved in the war over the constitutionality of Alabama's two-year statute of limitations continue to file briefs in the state's high court, which is looking into the question of whether a benzene plaintiff was denied due process when a trial court found his claims were barred by the statute. Cline v. Ashland Inc., et al., No. 1041076 (Ala. Sup. Ct.).

Plaintiff Jack Cline on July 7 filed a reply brief in the Alabama Supreme Court, contending the Business Council of Alabama, an amicus party in the action, is wrong in its assertion that the proper way …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone

June 27, 2024 - Buffalo, NY
The Richardson Hotel Buffalo

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: Video Game Addiction and the Latest Mass Tort Updates

May 29, 2024 - Salt Lake City, UT
The Grand America Hotel

MORE DETAILS