Plaintiffs in Calif. Plum Baby Food Litigation Say Claims are Not Preempted



DOCUMENTS
  • Opposition


OAKLAND, Calif. — Plaintiffs in a proposed class action accusing Plum Organics of failing to disclose that its baby foods contain heavy metals have opposed the company’s motion to dismiss, arguing their claims are not preempted by federal law because the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act exempts safety disclosures from preemption.

In a Dec. 1 brief filed before Judge Yvonne G. Rogers of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, plaintiffs further contend they have Article III standing because they have alleged an injury in fact.

Plaintiffs allege Plum knowingly remained silent on the presence of heavy …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's Pesticide Litigation Conference: A Plaintiff's Approach to Winning Pesticide Cases

June 16, 2022 - Denver, CO
Plaintiff-Only Event @ The Westin Denver Downtown

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference

June 13, 2022 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick

MORE DETAILS