Plaintiffs File Brief Supporting Efforts to Obtain Sanctions in C-8 Water Contamination Cases

  • Reply

COLUMBUS, Ohio –– Calling their motion for sanctions “straightforward,” plaintiffs with claims pending in the C-8 water contamination have filed a reply brief supporting their original position that DuPont continued with a deposition in violation of court orders.

In the Oct. 8 reply brief filed with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, the plaintiffs said the sanctions “include the ability to strike an affidavit and prevent a party from using it –– or the ability to strike a deposition transcripts as if it never happened.”

“DuPont does not defend its decisions as appropriate,” the reply brief …


HarrisMartin’s Webinar Series: Surgical Stapler Litigation

January 14, 2021 - Haddonfield, NJ
HarrisMartin Webinar Series


HarrisMartin's Webinar Series: Midwest Asbestos Litigation

December 02, 2020 - Haddonfield, NJ
HarrisMartin Webinar Series