Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Files Reply Brief Supporting Motion to Dismiss Cosmetic Asbestos Talcum Powder Claims

  • Motion
  • Opposition
  • Reply

PITTSBURGH, Pa. –– Whittaker, Clark & Daniels has filed a reply brief supporting its effort to dismiss cosmetic asbestos talcum powder claims, maintaining that there is no evidence to demonstrate that the decedent was exposed to any talcum powder that contained talc supplied by the company.

In a reply brief filed recently in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas for Allegheny County, WCD said that there is no evidence that the plaintiff used any product containing its talc, or that the talc contains asbestos.

In an amended complaint, the plaintiffs in the underlying case stated that Mary Herron frequently …


HarrisMartin’s Webinar Series: MDL Update on Philips CPAP, BiPAP & Ventilator Litigation

October 21, 2021 - Haddonfield, NJ
HarrisMartin Webinar Series


HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference

February 09, 2022 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick