Wis. Court Refuses to Substitute Asbestos Defendant in as Real Party in Interest for Insurer
September 25, 2019
DOCUMENTS
- Order
MILWAUKEE, Wis. –– A Wisconsin federal court has refused to substitute an asbestos defendant in for an insurer, saying that a settlement agreement between the two parties only granted the insurer a contractual right to be indemnified for asbestos-related liabilities.
In the Sept. 13 order, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin concluded that Rule 17(a) does not require that Eaton Corp. be substituted for First State Insurance Company as the real party in interest.
Plaintiff Eaton Corp. filed the underlying complaint, seeking a declaratory judgment against its insurers, saying the companies owed them coverage …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach