Ala. Judge Rejects Navy Plaintiff's Disclaimer, Upholds Federal Officer Removal
October 10, 2011
DOCUMENTS
- Opinion
SELMA, Ala. - A federal judge in Alabama has ruled that a formal Naval worker's asbestos-related lawsuit was properly removed under the federal officer removal statute, despite the plaintiffs' effort to disclaim that any of the allegations in his complaint were based on federal law. Kite v. Bill Vann Company Inc., et al., No. 11-0444 (S.D. Ala.).
Judge William H. Steele of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama ruled Sept. 29 that CBS Corp.'s removal based on its government contractor defense was adequate in light of plaintiff Cleveland Kite's initial refusal to abandon claims arising from …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone
June 27, 2024 - Buffalo, NY
The Richardson Hotel Buffalo
HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: Video Game Addiction and the Latest Mass Tort Updates
May 29, 2024 - Salt Lake City, UT
The Grand America Hotel