Plaintiffs: Borg-Warner Wrongfully Applies to their Mesothelioma Claims



DOCUMENTS
  • Bondex Response
  • Coalition for Litigation Justice Brief
  • Kelly-Moore Response
  • National Paint and Coatings Brief
  • Plaintiff Opening Brief
  • Plaintiff Reply Brief


FORT WORTH, Texas -- Plaintiffs in a Texas asbestos case have appealed the dismissal of two defendants who cited Borg-Warner admissibility standards in their motions for summary judgment, arguing that Borg-Warner did not create an "absolute requirement in every asbestos case that plaintiff product quantitative evidence of 'dose' to each defendant's product." Smith, et al. v. Bondex International Inc., et al., No. 02-08-00198-CV (Texas 2nd Dist. Ct. App.).

In the appeal, currently pending in the Second District Court of Appeals, the plaintiffs additionally argue that Borg-Warner is not applicable in mesothelioma cases since the facts in that case involved allegations …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: Video Game Addiction and the Latest Mass Tort Updates

May 29, 2024 - Salt Lake City, UT
The Grand America Hotel

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone

June 27, 2024 - Buffalo, NY
The Richardson Hotel Buffalo

MORE DETAILS