Application of ‘Avoidably Unsafe’ Doctrine Should be Decided on Case-By-Case Basis, Utah High Court Rules



DOCUMENTS
  • Opinion


SALT LAKE CITY – The question of whether the "unavoidably unsafe" doctrine in comment k to Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts applies to implanted medical devices should be decided on a case-by-case basis, the Utah Supreme Court has ruled.

In a Sept. 5 opinion, the high court answered certified questions posed by the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah. The high court concluded that “when an implanted medical device enters the market through the 510(k) process, and a manufacturer raises the affirmative defense that the product is unavoidably unsafe in response to a design defect …

FIRM NAMES
  • Duane Morris
  • Siegfried & Jensen
  • Snell & Wilmer
  • Warshauer-McLaughlin





UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Webinar Series: Acetaminophen ASD/ADHD Product Liability Litigation

October 21, 2022

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's Webinar Series: The Hottest Upcoming Device Projects - Strattice Hernia Mesh & Exactech Hip Implants

November 09, 2022

MORE DETAILS