Md. Federal Judge Denies BHR Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Legal Advice Documents



DOCUMENTS
  • Order


BALTIMORE — Documents containing legal advice to Smith & Nephew Inc.’s board of directors concerning metal-on-metal hip implants are shielded by the work product doctrine and attorney-client privilege because they were prepared in anticipation of litigation, a Maryland federal judge has ruled.

In a May 31 order, Judge Catherine C. Blake of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland denied plaintiffs’ motion to compel production of a briefing document, board of director meeting minutes, and a PowerPoint presentation presented to S&N’s board of directors.

In 2012, litigation was both pending and anticipated against S&N relating to its metal-on-metal …

FIRM NAMES
  • Irwin Fritchie Urquhart & Moore
  • Jones Ward
  • Meshbesher & Spence
  • Sidley Austin





UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Webinar Series: Acetaminophen ASD/ADHD Product Liability Litigation

October 21, 2022

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: The Current Mass Tort Landscape - Best Management Practices & Updates on Key Litigation

September 28, 2022 - St. Louis, MO
Four Seasons Hotel, St. Louis

MORE DETAILS