7th Cir. Upholds Award of Summary Judgment to C.R. Bard in Hernia Patch Case



DOCUMENTS
  • Opinion


CHICAGO — A federal district court properly awarded C.R. Bard and Davol Inc. summary judgment in a hernia mesh case because the causation theory presented by the plaintiffs’ expert was not sufficiently reliable, the 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has ruled.

In a Jan. 22 opinion, the appellate court said the expert’s “novel theory of causation” was not peer reviewed, professionally presented, consistent with the plaintiff’s medical records or autopsy, or substantiated by other cases. As such, the District Court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the expert testimony and awarding defendants summary judgment, the appellate court concluded.






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: Navigating Current Mass Tort Litigation

November 30, 2022 - New York, NY
The Knickerbocker

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin’s Webinar Series: Acetaminophen ASD/ADHD Product Liability Litigation

October 21, 2022

MORE DETAILS