BHR Hip Implant Plaintiffs Seek to Add Smith & Nephew plc as Defendant



DOCUMENTS
  • Reply


BALTIMORE — A couple is urging a Maryland federal judge to amend their complaint involving a BHR hip implant component to add Smith & Nephew plc as a defendant, arguing the United Kingdom-based holding company is an indispensable party.

In a May 25 reply filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, plaintiffs further maintain that even though their case was made part of the BHR multidistrict litigation, they are not prohibited from bringing claims against additional defendants.

According to a complaint originally filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Ronald Cox …

FIRM NAMES
  • Burch George & Germany
  • Dykema Gossett
  • Irwin Fritchie Urquhart & Moore
  • Sidley Austin





UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Webinar Series: Surgical Stapler Litigation

January 14, 2021 - Haddonfield, NJ
HarrisMartin Webinar Series

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's Webinar Series: Midwest Asbestos Litigation

December 02, 2020 - Haddonfield, NJ
HarrisMartin Webinar Series

MORE DETAILS