Surety Not Bound by Subcontract’s Arbitration Provision, D.C. Federal Judge Rules



DOCUMENTS
  • Order


WASHINGTON, D.C. — A surety company is not bound by an arbitration provision in a subcontract because the provision clearly only encompassed claims between the engineering company and its subcontractor, a District of Columbia federal judge has ruled.

In applying a heightened standard of “clear and unmistakable evidence,” Judge Tanya S. Chutkan of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia concluded in the Sept. 30 order that the surety company did not agree to arbitrate.

On January 25, 2012, Turner Construction retained U.S. Engineering to perform construction and renovation work at the South African Embassy in Washington, D.C. …

FIRM NAMES
  • Davis Wright Tremaine
  • Lathrop & Gage
  • Setliff & Holland





UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's Webinar Series: Science in Mass Torts - What You Need to Know

February 23, 2022 - None, None
None

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's Webinar Series: MDL Litigation Conference - Mass Tort Litigation & The Current Landscape

January 26, 2022 - Haddonfield, NJ
HarrisMartin's Webinar Series

MORE DETAILS