'Permissive' Wording Does Not Mandate Arbitration, Federal Judge Rules



DOCUMENTS
  • Opinion


WASHINGTON, D.C. - An arbitration clause which states that the parties "may" submit disputes to binding arbitration should be read as permissive and does not require the parties to arbitrate all disputes, a federal judge has ruled. PCH Mutual Insurance Co. v. Casualty & Surety Inc., No. 08-282 (D. D.C.).

On Nov. 15, Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia denied Casualty & Surety Inc.'s motion to compel arbitration of a dispute arising from its administrative services agreement with Casualty & Surety Inc.

In 2004, PCH, a risk retention group that provides coverage to …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: Video Game Addiction and the Latest Mass Tort Updates

May 29, 2024

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's Webinar Series: Video Game Addiction Product Liability Litigation

March 29, 2024

MORE DETAILS