Radiator Specialty Argues its Warning Labels Not Subject to State Regulations



DOCUMENTS
  • Response


PHILADELPHIA -- Radiator Specialty has defended its choice to remove a benzene lawsuit to federal court, arguing that the decision to remand the claims would indicate that product warning labels would be subject to individual state warning requirements instead of federal mandates. Ellett, et al. v. Radiator Specialty, et al., No. 05-2060 (E.D. Pa.).

In a Sept. 2 opposition filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Radiator Specialty opposes the plaintiffs' motion to remand, reasserting that the claims are subject to the Federal Hazardous Substances Act.

'A contrary ruling would mean that Radiator's product warning …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's Masters of Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone

June 27, 2024 - Buffalo, NY
The Richardson Hotel Buffalo

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: Video Game Addiction and the Latest Mass Tort Updates

May 29, 2024

MORE DETAILS