Benzene Defendants File Reply Brief in Appeal of $1.76 Million Judgment, Say ‘Not Substantial Evidence’ to Support Verdict



DOCUMENTS
  • Brief


ST. LOUIS –– Benzene defendants against whom a $1.76 million judgment was entered have filed their appellate brief, saying that crucial portions of the verdict form and instructions that led to inconsistent findings that the defendants were negligent.

In the Feb. 13 reply brief filed in the 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Lyondell defendants said that much of the plaintiff’s evidence “cannot support the jury’s award because it does not even concern ‘conduct of the defendant arising from the claim’ –– failing to warn of the dangers of benzene exposure at the Clinton Plant –– as required by Iowa …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's Midwest Asbestos Litigation Conference

September 23, 2022 - St. Louis, MO
Four Seasons Hotel, St. Louis

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's MDL Conference

July 27, 2022 - Seattle, WA
Fairmont Olympic Hotel, Seattle

MORE DETAILS