Plaintiffs Respond to Motion for Sanctions, Defend Pleadings in Ohio Case

  • Motion for Protective Order
  • Motion for Sanctions
  • Opposition

CLEVELAND -- Parties in an Ohio case alleging personal injury and property damage claims have exchanged briefing on whether the plaintiffs have properly complied with discovery orders, with the plaintiffs arguing that the court has already recognized that they will not be able to identify every chemical component in gasoline or diesel fuel. Baker, et al. v. Chevron USA Inc., et al., No. 05-227 (S.D. Ohio).

In a Dec. 15 opposition filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, the plaintiffs contend that they responded to the defendant's interrogatories with guidance from the court and, as …


HarrisMartin's Webinar Series: Natural Disaster Litigation - Insurance and Beyond - Winter Storm Uri and Hurricane Sally

March 09, 2021 - Haddonfield, NJ
HarrisMartin Webinar Series


HarrisMartin's Webinar Series: The Elmiron MDL - Hear from the Leadership Counsel

March 05, 2021 - Haddonfield, NJ
HarrisMartin Webinar Series