Wash. Court Reverses Order Tossing Asbestos Claims on Statute of Repose Grounds, Says Premises Owner-Related Claims Can Proceed

  • Order

SEATTLE –– A Washington appellate court has reversed in part an order tossing asbestos claims on statute of repose grounds, ruling that while the plaintiffs could not bring claims against the defendant for construction-related activities, claims arising out of the defendant’s role as a premises owner could proceed.

In the May 13 order, the Washington Court of Appeals, Division One, wrote that the trial court should “not have dismissed [the plaintiffs’] claims arising out of PacifiCorp’s status as a premises owner as barred by the statute of repose.”

The plaintiffs asserted the claims on behalf of Gary Cameron, contending …


HarrisMartin's Webinar Series: The Hottest Upcoming Device Projects - Strattice Hernia Mesh & Exactech Hip Implants

November 09, 2022


HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: The Current Mass Tort Landscape - Best Management Practices & Updates on Key Litigation

September 28, 2022 - St. Louis, MO
Four Seasons Hotel, St. Louis